Jump to content

Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Illustration Workshop   Map Workshop   Photography Workshop   Video and Sound Workshop  

Photography workshop

Shortcuts

This workshop is part of the Graphic Lab, a project aimed at picture retouching to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. More information about the lab can be found on its main page and requests pages (Illustrations ; Photographs ; Maps ; Video and Sound). To ask questions or make a suggestions, see the talk page of the graphic lab page.

This specific page is the requests page for the Photography Workshop. Anyone can make a request for a photograph to be improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.

Make a request

Show manual procedures

Use the following template when making a new request, replacing the examples with your image(s) and request(s):

<gallery>
 IMAGENAME.EXT|Description of image
 IMAGE#TWO.EXT|2nd image (If there is one)
 ETCETCETC.EXT|Don't request too many at once, though
</gallery>

;Request:
: Details of your request go here… --~~~~
;Graphist opinion(s):

See also

[edit]
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 10 days and sections whose resolved comment is older than 185 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2025.


Background removal

[edit]

Article(s): en:Nightline, en:American Broadcasting Company, en:ABC World News Tonight

Request
Cleanup
remove what? Grunpfnul (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crack in glass plate image

[edit]

Article(s): [[]]

Request
Can the crack in the glass plate be removed and joined? The image is a bit on the dark side too, and could use more exposure. Thanks! --Niels Johannes (talk) 10:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
Started the Restauration of this Image (Work in Progress). Crack is fixed, now Fingerprints and Emulsion are in dire need to be repaired, after that the Difference in the Luminance will be corrected Grunpfnul (talk) 22:21, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's looking so much better already. Looking forward for the final result. Vielen dank! Niels Johannes (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw the light reflexion

[edit]

Article(s): Wikidata:Q134711133

Request
Is it possible withdraw the light reflexion on this photo? Thank you. GualdimG (talk) 07:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
NB: There are more images of this painting in Category:Baptism of Jesus Christ (Church of Nossa Senhora dos Mártires, Constância) that can help with this. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Erroneous colour profile

[edit]
Request
repair colour profile to match e.g. File:Little Tern birds 6.jpg - MPF (talk) 15:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
Sorry, i can't help here. Does no RAW exists? Grunpfnul (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@MPF: I was able to reduce the color cast; please tell me whether it is good for you.✓ Done--Carnby (talk) 04:39, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Clean up to improve appearance

[edit]

Article(s): en:Paul Martin (illustrator) - reachable via the link in reference 201.

Request

Hello. I am the original uploader of this image. I still have the original magazine. I would like to avoid any alterations that would require a new file name. Please tweak this image to make it more presentable. Notice how there is a bluish tint or something in the lower-third left section, for instance. The background should be more naturally uniform. I'd appreciate just some touch-ups to improve the overall quality without creating a new file name. That might mean improving the focus and coloring and removing any glare area. I attempted to improve the image with my basic image editor on May 2, 2025 (under "File history"). However, I seemed to give it an artificial glitter appearance instead. Update. I increased size and tried again w/o success on 7/5.

Graphist opinion(s)


Image restorations

[edit]

Article(s): de:Nikolaikirche (Heilbronn), de:Jakob Friedrich Bengel, de:Villa Rümelin (Wilhelmstraße), de:Liste der abgegangenen Heilbronner Gebäude und Denkmäler

Request
Could someone restorate these old pictures, so they look more clearly? Thanks in advance.--RaveDog (talk) 13:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@RaveDog:
1st one at https://ibb.co/99dFL2gf
2nd one dehalftoned at https://ibb.co/6JX7kh3N
3rd one sharpened (AI was no good) at https://ibb.co/W4sMznY1
4th dehalftoned at https://ibb.co/9mSTD4YG
5th is a pain in the ass! Too many holes, and they're everywhere. The PSD is at https://files.catbox.moe/j9e48z.psd. I might work on it later, but I got some of the holes and fixed the highlights. JayCubby (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work! For the 5th one we might wait as you said. @Rosenzweig As a long-time editor of articles about Heilbronn topics, what do you think? Are the edited versions appropriate for the Wikipedia articles listed above? RaveDog (talk) 21:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They're not worse, but also not that much better. With the original files being as bad as they are, you can't expect that much of an improvement apparently. So I'm rather indifferent about it. --Rosenzweig τ 05:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your opinion. Thanks again to the editor of the images. RaveDog (talk) 16:02, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, it didn't take me very long at all. It's a lot easier to dedither higher-resolution images, generally. JayCubby (talk) 16:20, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Sonoma Plaza

[edit]

Article(s): Sonoma Plaza

Request
This pic set needs adjustment.--Carnby (talk) 04:39, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jeez. That's pretty bad. For the first one, File:VIEW FROM NORTH-EAST (FRONT) - Blue Wing Inn, 133 East Spain Street, Sonoma, Sonoma County, CA HABS CAL,49-SONO,3-1.tif or File:Sonoma - Blue Wing Inn - 20201025013755.jpg might be viable replacements. JayCubby (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Sioux Indian execution

[edit]

Article(s): Extensive

Request
Could someone restore the image? It's far too large for me to work with. It just needs color correction and some crease removal --JayCubby (talk) 20:17, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)

✓ Done Auguel (talk) 14:28, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Touchup for old photo

[edit]

Article(s): Simón Radowitzky

Request
This is the highest resolution version of this photo that I have been able to find. There's still some signs of the photograph's age, with scratches and fading, and the contrast leaves a bit to the imagination. If anyone here is able to give this a wee clean up, I'd really appreciate it. --Grnrchst (talk) 18:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)

I increased the contrast Auguel (talk) 13:37, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ambassadors

[edit]

Article(s): en:List of ambassadors of Indonesia

Request
Please make amendments on the image based on the captions; just override the image and upload directly onto it! Thank you --Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 23:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeromi Mikhael
2nd one done. JayCubby (talk) 00:19, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
First one ✓ Done Auguel (talk) 02:16, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Crop photo

[edit]

Article(s): it:Lamborghini Temerario, it:DeTomaso Pantera

Request
Crop photos to focus only on car. --37.159.49.195 09:43, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)

 Comment: @37.159.49.195: This is the sort of easy enough work you can do yourself quite easily by using the "Crop Tool" and leaving this page for more complex requests. When you want to crop an image I suggest you consider using the CropTool that can be activated in your commons Preferences, under Gadgets. The CropTool will then appears in the left side of your screen. It saves everyone a lot of time because it transfers all the correct and appropriate information into the cropped image, such as source, license, author, etc. It even leaves a backlink to the original and visa versa so long as the original has been positively reviewed. That way all the proper information is there and most often does not need to be manually reviewed again. If you are just cropping a small bit of the image like a frame you may decide to overwrite the original image but for more major crops you should upload the cropped version as a separate new image with a new name, but you have a choice. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Making concert picture clearer

[edit]

Article(s): Scorsese Baby Daddy

Request
The backlighting is messing things up (highlights/shadows are off, pic looks somewhat hazy). Would like the image to overall look clearer. Thanks :) --PSA (talk) 06:45, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
is this what you had in mind?
KendrickSZASPurs230725-53 Edit
Grunpfnul (talk) 07:36, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Grunpfnul sorry I couldn't respond sooner; didn't see this in my notifications. But yes, this is wonderful! Crank the saturation down and I think I'd be satisfied. Thanks, PSA (talk) 03:41, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)


Watermark

[edit]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. – Pbrks (t • c) 13:40, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Article(s): wikidata:Q135802449

Request
Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
@GualdimG: ✓ Done – Pbrks (t • c) 13:40, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Photo perspective and cropping

[edit]

Article(s): nl:Oude stadhuis (Eindhoven)

Request
Hi! Could the photo perspectives of these two photos be enhanced (by which I mean: very sharp, straight edges) and then be cropped? Could a new, cropped version be uploaded instead of replacing it? Thanks in advance! Kind regards, --S. Perquin (talk) 13:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
There seems to be some barrel distortion. Is there any chance of reshooting with another lens? cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 15:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I only have one lens and I can't go back there easily either unless I make a new appointment to get there. 😕 Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 16:19, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. They will do. How should they be cropped? To the crest for the first? The second is already as tight as feasible. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 16:59, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally, right up to the edges, indeed! So, in the case of the window, the white edges form the outer sides of the image. And in the case of the stone, the white edges form the outer edges. The edges of the stone could perhaps be filled with white, so that the stone is cut out very precisely. Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 20:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@S. Perquin: Both ✓ Done. Revert if you wouldn't like. JayCubby (talk) 14:52, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed you preferred a crop. Whoops... JayCubby (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear JayCubby, thank you for your adjustment! However, what I meant was to crop it in such a way that it becomes slightly distorted so that it fits within the frames. So not necessarily just cutting it out, but also distorting the entire image. Do you know how to do this? I look forward to hearing from you or someone else! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 16:17, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see now that you made the stained glass window the way I meant it! 😄 Could you apply something similar to the stone? And then as a new image, so not overwritten. Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 16:19, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@S. Perquin, how is https://ibb.co/mCHmkgQ7 ?
Distortion correction crops an image slightly, FYI. JayCubby (talk) 01:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good! Thank you so much! Could you perhaps re-upload the two images and mention that they are derived from the two images I had uploaded? I'm not sure how to do the last part correctly! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 02:18, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Watermark

[edit]
Request
Would you please remove the watermark? Thank you. Yeagvr (talk) 09:32, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
✓ Done Listz3 (talk)