Commons : Graphic Lab/Map workshop

The larger circles are the terminus stations for the urban train services (keep in mind that in the case of blue line it is outdated, that station Caíde is not the terminal station for that line anymore.
I personally like the NS style map of showing all the services on the map altogether. I even personally started to draft a diagram on that direction but yeah, I am more a programmer than a designer 😅
The end goal would be a map showing CP and Metro do Porto together. But I think that the intermediate step of the CP network is also useful (as in a separate file in Commons). In this case, I think it'd make sense to indicate the stations that you can change to Metro do Porto with it's "M" icon next to the station names.--ArlindoPereira (talk) 10:39, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

”blue line it is outdated, that station Caíde is not the terminal station for that line anymore”, anything I need to change?
”I personally like the NS style map”. That is more or less what we have but as a map not a diagram but we were talking about doing that as well. Your diagram is good, so if you want to do them yourself that’s fine by me.
I have only found two stations which are both train and metro. If any more you have to tell me.

Draft proto train-2. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Draft porto trains-3

I like this style with a white "center" on the line. Once you integrate the Metro lines, it will differentiate them (because they use very similar colors).
There are five CP stations that integrate with Metro do Porto: Porto-Campanhã, Porto-São Bento, General Torres, Contumil and Rio Tinto.
Other than that, I think it would be better that the Metro do Porto logo M letter would be aligned with the station name. Like this: "Porto-Campanhã (M)"
The section on yellow line between Coimbões and Porto-Campanhã will probably be a bit harder because it is almost horizontal. I suggest aligning the labels diagonally, but if you don't want that a solution with indication arrows could also be an option.

ArlindoPereira (talk) 14:02, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny, I had already moved the M before reading your comment. I have two versions, with the M close to the station or on the far side of the name, I like the M close to the station but it's up to you.
I don't understand about the "horizontal", this is what OSM shows and my line follows that?

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:40, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah both versions are fine, let's roll with the M close to the station.
I might not have expressed clearly, I was trying to say that on the yellow line, the sequence of stations Coimbões, V.N. Gaia - Devesas and General Torres could be hard to legend because they were almost in an horizontal axis, but this time you made it fit perfectly :)
The next improvement in terms of signaling / integrations could be indicating on which stations the user could change to the InterCidades (long distance) or Alfa Pendular (HST), but I am not sure if that would pollute the map. If you want to try:
- Alfa Pendular - logo (probably it'd make sense to just use the rounded part, and leave the full one for the corner legend)
  - Stations (along green and yellow lines): Braga, Nine, Famalicão, Porto-Campanhã, V.N. Gaia - Devesas, Espinho, Aveiro
- InterCidades - logo
  - Stations:
    - (green line) Braga, Nine, Famalicão, Trofa, Porto-Campanhã
    - (red line) Guimarães, Vizela, Santo Tirso
    - (yellow line) Espinho, Ovar, Estarreja, Aveiro

ArlindoPereira (talk) 18:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en something that I forgot to mention: on the legend, the "Integração - Gratuita" doesn't make sense in the Portuguese reality, since it's charged per zones, so all integration is not charged extra. So it could be simply "Integração" or "Transbordo", or maybe not even mention at all (it's "just a station" after all). ArlindoPereira (talk) 18:12, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en asked for some feedback from the Portuguese community on SSC (link) and here's it:

"Integração" only makes sense in Brazilian Portuguese. In European Portuguese it must be "Transbordo".
A couple of typos:
- Coimbões -> Coimbrões (Yellow line)
- Pereirnhas -> Pereirinhas (Red line)
I missed another Metro do Porto integration: on Hospital São João (Hosp. S. João, purple line).
It could also be useful to mention with continuity arrows the possible integrations outside of the suburban trains network. Those would be:
- Green line
  - Nine: Valença (north)
- Blue line
  - Marco de Canaveses: Pocinho (east)
- Yellow line
  - Espinho: Vouga (southeast)
  - Aveiro: Lisboa (south), Vouga (east)

ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en someone pointed out an important detail that I wasn't aware (and that I checked and is true). Despite the indication on original CP Map, the new Leixões line is actually operated with Porto-Campanhã as a passthrough station, not as a final station. The trains start at Leça do Balio, pass through Porto-Campanhã and go south sharing rails with yellow line until station Ovar. Which means that the section between Porto-Campanhã and Ovar should be represented with yellow and purple lines.--ArlindoPereira (talk) 09:41, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira
Draft porto trains-4. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 10:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Looking nice. The Leixões line is with a different color though. I have a suggestion, let me know what you think: what if there is a "flying junction", i.e. instead of arriving from Leça do Balio to Contumil on the left, it arrives on the right. Then, it can continue with the same purple color all the way to Ovar. WDYT?

Other than that, some small points:

Some integrations are a bit off. For instance:
- Aveiro line (yellow)
  - Espinho station, the logo to the left looks a bit weird, as if it belongs to Silvade station. I'd put both of them to the right.
  - On Porto-S. Bento, it's probably better to align it horizontally instead of letting the logo fall below the name.
  - On Porto-Campanhã, the two logos aligned vertically look a bit weird to me, I think it'd be best to set them horizontally.
- Braga line (green)
  - Famalicão with the logos on both sides looks a bit off to me, I think both to the right might look best.
  - Same on Nine and Braga stations.

ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en some extra feedback I collected from SSC:

have the integration logo always on the left, except for special cases such as Porto-S.Bento and Gaia-Devesas
change "Transbordo" to "Conexão"
change "Transbordo outra" to "Conexão para outros serviços"
the connection order to show the connections, for the station that have multiple connections, should be Metro do Porto - Alfa Pendular - InterCidades, on that order.

--ArlindoPereira (talk) 12:31, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Leixões "lines" are actually one so it's the same color. Color do look different depending on neighboring colors.

Draft porto trains-5. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Oh, of course, I beg your pardon. Looks very nice. Minor fixes / suggestions:

on the legend, drop the written part of Alfa Pendular (keep only the circle logo)
align the legend on the right, so all "Conexão (...)" are vertically aligned

ArlindoPereira (talk) 07:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en found another typo: in blue line, station "Suão" should be "Suzão". ArlindoPereira (talk) 09:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en more fine-tuning to improve readability:

move V.N. Gaia-Devesas to the left of the line, move Metro logo to it's left;
move logos on Rio Tinto, Contumil, Porto-Campanhã, General Torres, Vizelas and Guimarães to the right of their stations names;
on Porto-S. Bento, move Metro logo to the left of the station name;
add InterCidades logo at V.N. Gaia-Devesas;
the Flying Junction on Leixões line should be between Contumil and Porto-Campanhã;
on Santo Tirso, move InterCidades logo to below the station name;
on the legend, change "Conexão para outros serviços" to "Conexão com outros serviços".

ArlindoPereira (talk) 13:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"move V.N. Gaia-Devesas to the left of the line, move Metro logo to it's left;", there is no Metro logo
Draft porto trains-6.

--------------------------

Something totally different.

We are working on Portugal stuff here and it happens to be that I'm planning a road trip for the better part of May just to Portugal and the Atlantic cliffs in southern Portugal, coincidence.

But I have had to change the plans a bit so now I will go done to the Atlantic cliffs in north west Spain, Mia (my life companion doesn't want me to be away too long) from southern Sweden where I live. Hopefully it will be nice. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(that's right, there will be a Metro station over there but it is under construction now, sorry for the confusion)
looking nice! :) I'll gather some more feedback from SSC folks (here, that page and the next one)
looks like a lovely trip! I personally lived in Porto region for 1,5 year during Covid time and never explored much to the south, only went to Aveiro once.--ArlindoPereira (talk) 16:10, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en some extra feedback from SSC:

Hosp. S. João (purple line), align the name to the center bottom of the station, and align the Metro icon to the left of it;
Trofa (red/green lines) is missing InterCidades icon; because it is too close of next station Lousado, it is probably better to the name to the left and it's icon to the left of the name;
On Braga, Nine, Famalicão (green line), Espinho, Ovar (yellow/purple lines) and Estarreja (yellow line), move the icons to the right of the station names;
On Aveiro (yellow line), move the station name to where the icons are, and move the icons to the left of the name;
On V.N.Gaia-Devesas (yellow/purple lines), try setting it into a single line, so it is not too close to Porto-S. Bento.
On Pereirinhas (red line), the syllable separation is broken, it should be Perei-rinhas --ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:39, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Tried something more in line with the rest on Trofa.

Draft porto trains-7. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en we're getting close :) Noticed a couple of typos:

Mouquin -> Mouquim
Terronas -> Terronhas

ArlindoPereira (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en a couple more improvements, from SSC folks:

Braga: move logos to the right of the name
Trofa: move logo to the bottom of the name (so it is more clearly connected with it and not to Lousado)
On the legends:
- Add " do Porto" in "Conexão com Metro"
- A subtitle to both CP long-distance services: "CP Longo Curso"
- Invert InterCidades with Alfa Pendular (so AP comes first and IC comes second) --ArlindoPereira (talk) 12:41, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Draft porto trains-11.

Add " do Porto" in "Conexão com Metro, it did only say Conexão Metro so I added the com also.
A subtitle to both CP long-distance services: "CP Longo Curso", don't understand which you mean, which both?
Draft porto train-8.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en with the line break it is not so good, maybe increase the legend box width so the whole line "Conexão com Metro do Porto" fits on a single line?

I meant creating a subtitle for the connection with long distance trains, more or less like this:


(@)  Conexão com Metro do Porto
CP Longo Curso
-- ----- -----
(@)  Conexão com Alfa Pendular
(@)  Conexão com InterCidades
(@) Conexão com outros serviços

--ArlindoPereira (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Draft porto train-9. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en sorry, spotted yet another typo (hopefully the last one) on purple line: "S. Mamede de Infesta" --ArlindoPereira (talk) 09:14, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Don't be sorry, be happy, the map becomes better. Added scale.

When you show those draft in other communities I would be happy if you could inform that "Those drafts are shown for proofreading only."
And that I would be grateful if you deleted them as soon as the are not used any more (concluded discussions).
Draft porto train-10.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Sure, edited the posts removing the intermediate steps and mentioned the quoted request, no problem.

I believe we have reached it's final stage before adding the Metro network. I'll give it a day to collect feedback from the SSC community but I think we won't find any other typos.

Do you think it is possible to fit the "Pereirinhas" station on a single line, without the line break? It seems to be possible, but I don't know if it would make it too close to the next station to the right.--ArlindoPereira (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What I would like to do is to create the map with just Metro network, then we can add them as one. So as I see we will have three maps. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en perfect, let's publish this one then and start the Metro one. As the network is on a small scale, it can be a bit closer (as in the basemap zoomed in a bit); eventually when we join the two, the CP map might need to be cutted a bit to fit (for instance between Nine to the north and Valadares to the south). ArlindoPereira (talk) 20:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the correct area for Metro?

I will need the following;

Name of the file
Description (/language)
Captions/s (/language)
Category/ies at commons
Structured data/Items portrayed in this file, the Q#, to be able to upload it at commons, thanks.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa dos Comboios Urbanos do Porto / Porto Urban Trains Map
Mapa da região norte de Portugal mostrando as cinco linhas de comboios urbanos operados pela CP, e as integrações com demais linhas da CP e com o Metro do Porto. / Map of Portugal's north region showing the five urban train lines operated by CP and their integration with other CP lines and the Metro do Porto.
(not sure how the description and the caption should be equal or different from each other)
Category:CP Urbanos, Category:Comboios de Portugal, Category:Public transport maps
Q2624115, Q10388221, Q10384270, Q25430027, Q124220670, Q18473945, Q124221046, Q2652989, Q86274083 --ArlindoPereira (talk) 12:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ArlindoPereira
- / slashes or backslashes is not good in filenames, changed to _.
- Caption is intended to be a short oneliner description, computers and search engines from outside of wikimedia can read that field so stuff on commons can be found from the whole of internet.
- I had forgotten to add "place" map so I added and there for I show a new Draft porto train-12. Please replay to that, thanks.
- Could you also check the overall area for metro below.
--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 11:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en looks perfect, I think it is ready to be published. For the filename, I think you can choose either the Portuguese or the English one, not necessarily both. ArlindoPereira (talk) 11:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ArlindoPereira

Now you can find it here Porto Urban Trains Map.
Please check all the information, also links for wikipedia, wikidata and structured data.

Done --=== Metro Porto ===please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en super, all is correct, already added to articles in multiple languages. Thanks :) ArlindoPereira (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Porto

Extended content

@ArlindoPereira:

@Goran tek-en: It needs to go further north. The northest station is Póvoa de Varzim. The other limits are correct.--ArlindoPereira (talk) 12:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Is not the line E supposed to go all the way to Estádio do Dragão, OSM. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en it was reduced, and later expanded to it again. Looks like OSM is outdated. ArlindoPereira (talk) 20:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en diagram with lines G, H and metroBus (under construction);

Nothing is fine tuned.
There is a dense area in center, one thing I can do is enlarge the overall area in px (now 1601 in height, maybe increase to around 2000), I's a bit of work but I think it would be good for the whole map.
Please check all names etc even if we enlarge it.
Draft metro-1.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Yeah, it might make sense to enlarge it a little bit as the stations in the central area / close to where yellow line intercepts the main trunk are quite dense.

Typos / small errors:

Main trunk: Senora da Hora -> Senhora da Hora; NorteShopping/Sete Bicas -> NorteShopping / Sete Bicas (a space before and after slash);
Blue line: Eatádio do Mar -> Estádio do Mar;
- Câmara Matosinhos and Matosinhos Sul are inverted (the correct order is Brito Capelo - Matosinhos Sul - Câmara Matosinhos - Parque Real)
Red line: Vilo do Conde -> Vila do Conde; VC Fashion outlet / Modivas -> VC Fashion Outlet / Modivas;
Green line: Paraque Maia -> Parque Maia;
Yellow line: Salguerios -> Salgueiros; Hospital Santos Silvia -> Hospital Santos Silva;
Orange line: Bagium -> Baguim

Also, it might make sense to know that there are two other metro lines (G and H, pink and dark red) in construction, as well as a BRT named metroBus that will also be operated by them. So you can show them on a dashed color, or not even show them at first but keep in mind that they will soon-ish exist and avoid rework. I will double check whether they are mapped on OSM already and let you know.--ArlindoPereira (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Line G on OSM (there's no relat=== Metro Porto ===ion, only the `railway=construction`, you'd need to follow the segments to south): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771593370 (if you need, I can make a list of OSM ways);
Line H: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771593371;
metroBus: is the `highway=busway` (green dashed line) on https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/41.158503/-8.634825&layers=P, goes until Império station here https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/41.155296/-8.673245&layers=P, also no relation yet.

ArlindoPereira (talk) 18:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are the metro lines just called A B ...

Draft metro-2.

What I found for under construction.

Draft under construction-1. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:11, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Yes, just letters. Their names have to be "Linha X" instead of "Linha de X". Just to give some small context on Portuguese, CP's lines are "Linha de XXX" because that means "XXX's Line", whereas MdP lines are "Linha X", meaning "X Line".

Yes those are the three projects currently in construction. Please let me know if you want me to list / get OSM links for the stations. Line G / pink will connect to existing stations Casa da Música (main trunk) and São Bento (yellow); Line H / dark red will connect to existing stations Casa da Música (main trunk) and Santo Ovídio (yellow); metroBus line 1 will connect to Casa da Música as well.

Out of those, the subway lines are currently under construction and will probably open next year or 2027, while metroBus is with the infrastructure (roads / stops) ready, but the vehicles are delayed, so it will probably start later this year. --ArlindoPereira (talk) 12:07, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en on top of that, some thoughts regarding the line name pills:

On blue/orange line start, put line A and line F, in that order, above Senhor de Matosinhos station;
On Estádio do Dragão, put lines in alphabetical order: A, B, F.

ArlindoPereira (talk) 12:17, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Please the stations on OSM, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Line G, color pink, stations:
- Casa da Música (adjacent to the existing one, you can put it on the same point on the map);
- Galiza [1]
- Hospital de Santo António [2]
- São Bento (adjacent to the existing one, you can put it on the same point on the map).
Line H, color dark red / wine, stations:
- Casa da Música;
- Campo Alegre [3];
- Arrábida [4];
- Candal (between those two roundabouts: [5]);
- Rotunda [6];
- Devesas (connection to train station) [7];
- Soares dos Reis (between these two schools [8]);
- Santo Ovídio.
MetroBus Line 1, color turquoise, stations:
- Casa da Música;
- Guerra Junqueiro [9];
- Bessa [10];
- Pinheiro Manso [11];
- Serralves [12];
- João de Barros [13];
- Império [14].

Also, MetroBus uses this weird B logo, similar to the M for Metro do Porto, but rotated clockwise: [15] ArlindoPereira (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira For G and H, either have you mixed them in this post or I have mixed them on the drawing? --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en just double checked, you have mixed them. Line G is the smaller one and Line H is the bigger one (links to Wikipedia articles). ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:42, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Draft GH1-2. I keep them hidden for now.

What's next?

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Will have to create a svg for the logo. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en I think that for better understanding, the metrobus line "pill" could read "MetroBus Linha 1". Other than that looks fine. :)

I think the next step is setting legends etc. and releasing. This step should be relatively easy.

I checked on our Rio map and there we have a thin black line on top of the colored lines for Metro. Then we have buses just as colored lines. As we are going to add a bus line later on and now you are talking about more stuff for the + map I think we should keep this. Is that fine with you?
Draft metro-3.

If the draft above is good, I will need the following;

Name of the file
Description (/language)
Captions/s (/language)
Category/ies at commons
Structured data/Items portrayed in this file, the Q#, to be able to upload it at commons, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 13:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en hmmm I think that the black line doesn't make sense here. We used in Rio because we needed to differentiate four networks that used roughly the same colors (trains, subway, light rail, BRT), while the same doesn't happen in Porto. I think how it was before was better. Maybe we can save this style (think black line) to differentiate the metroBus from the regular Metro lines, when it launch.

Metro do Porto Network Map (en)

Mapa da Rede do Metro do Porto (pt)

Um mapa contendo as seis linhas do Metro do Porto, mostrando as conexões com as estações de comboio da CP.

A map with the six lines from Metro do Porto light rail, showing the connection with the heavy rail stations from CP.

categories: [16], [17]

wikidata: [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]--ArlindoPereira (talk) 20:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reason to keep the black line is so the maps has some kind of similarity and even more important so that people with color deficiency can tell them (different types of transportation) apart so much better.

It's kind of important to me so is it very important to you not to have the black lines? --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en, ok, fair enough, let's keep it then :) ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now you can find it here Metro do Porto Network Map.

Please check all the information, also links for wikipedia, wikidata and structured data.
Done

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 19:26, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en looks nice :) but I noticed we missed the CP icon for the Metro stations that have integrations with the train. Those would be:

Main trunk
- Campanhã
Yellow line
- Hospital São João
- São Bento
- General Torres
Orange line
- Campainha

ArlindoPereira (talk) 11:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Similarly, it'd be nice to include an icon in São Bento mentioning the connection to Funicular dos Guindais, a funicular that connects the upper and lower areas in downtown Porto. ArlindoPereira (talk) 13:49, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Do we have an icon? --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en [25] for CP (use only the green part) and [26] (only the shield) for the funicular.

Btw as that logo is not vector, if you could create a svg version of it, would be great. Should be relatively simple to vectorize.--ArlindoPereira (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Draft metro porto-4. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:09, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Have you seen the draft above?

I'm busy right now and in the beginning of next week I will go (hopefully) on my road trip so I will not be able to much work for a month or so. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, was AFK last week on a small holiday :)

Looks great, you can go ahead and update the public file with it. --ArlindoPereira (talk) 09:25, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en sorry forgot to ping you :( please check above message. Thanks ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira So now I'm back and in tune with life.

I found some things I was not happy with around Trindade so now I have another Draft metro porto-5. You can compare to Draft 4 above, let me know which you want, I vote for 5. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en hey, good to see that you're back. :)

Both are fine for me, I think I prefer 4 a little bit better because on 5 the legend Trindade is too close to Faria Guimarães, whereas on 4 Trindade is not so close to Lapa. OTOH on 4 Faria Guimarães is split in two lines and it looks better on a single line as in 5. --ArlindoPereira (talk) 07:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira I did some minor edits to the names and then uploaded version 5. We can always change that if we want. Will now continue with Train + Metro.

Done --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 13:34, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Super, thanks :) --ArlindoPereira (talk) 14:16, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Train + Metro Porto

The hard step (in my opinion) will be integrating the two networks together, as the Metro is much denser. Maybe with an inset area, similar to what was done in Rio map. If zoomed in enough, we could also try to integrate smaller networks, such as the three tram lines ("Eléctrico" in pt-pt): Line 1, Line 18 and Line 22, as well as smaller transports such as Funicular dos Guindais and the Gaia Cable Car / Teleférico de Gaia (this one, touristic). ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC) [reply]

Extended content

Train Porto-Campanhã is not the same as metro Campanhã what I can see but train Porto-Campanhã has a metro symbol. So it's different stations but you can walk in between them and continue your travel?
Same with Porto-São Bento and São Bento?
In this mixed map maybe I can join Porto and not Porto for those two?

But that will give a small discrepancies between this mixed and the separate train and metro map but I don't think I can avoid it? --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Draft insets 1&2-4.

Yes, Porto-Campanhã is a heavy rail station operated by CP and (Metro) Campanhã is a light rail station operated by Metro do Porto. The stations lie side by side and you can walk between them with corridors.
- I have an old video, from the pandemic years (it is so weird to rewatch those videos wearing masks...), showing the two Campanhã stations. Unfortunately it is in Portuguese but you can ignore the audio and activate the automatic subtitles in English. By the 7 minute mark I walk from the light rail to the heavy rail station. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwIs3p5l2vk
Similarly, Porto-São Bento and São Bento, but in this case the Metro one is underground.
Yeah with the two maps united I think it might make sense to supress the "Porto-" prefix and show both stations together. It is a bit hard to imagine how that would look. But I feel it should be similar to what we did on Rio map with the São Cristóvão or the Maracanã stations (in case of São Bento) and similar to Central do Brasil for Campanhã.--ArlindoPereira (talk) 20:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira I'm confused here, above you wrote about adding "smaller networks". I was sure I had done that somewhere but I can't find it now. Do you remember if I showed you a draft with them? --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:45, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en I believe we never worked on the tram / funicular network. Just checked all draft links on our threads, except for drafts 4 and 5 above all others were removed, but I don't remember working on those for Porto. Maybe you're remembering working on tram lines for Rio? --ArlindoPereira (talk) 07:33, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Now I really need your support and feedback.

I have decided to try with two insets, #2 zooming in even more from #1. I'm not really sure if it works but to get all in I had to do something. So here is a draft for those Draft 1&2 insets-1.

I have made a lot of guessing so check everything.

Inset 1.

Is it correct that M Campainha has a paid connection to T Rio Tinto and not between the two Rio Tinto?

Depending on which is correct we might have to correct M and T maps.

I have some problems with stop names; Bolhão, Campo 24 Agosto, Heroísmo.

Inset 2.

When I look at the Metro map at São Bento there are both a logo for train connection but also Funicular dos Guindais, is this correct and if so where should it connect?
Batalha, same name several times?
Connection between the two Aliados?

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:30, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en oh it is looking already really nice. Let's go to your points

- Different of Rio, there is no concept of "free connection" vs. "paid connection" in Porto public transport. It is charged per zones of the city (similar to "ring" in other countries such as Germany, but the zones are not concentric). So it is only a connection. If you want, you could differentiate the transfers between the same systems to the transfers to other systems, but it does not make sense in terms of fare (it'd be the same fare).

- Regarding Train Rio Tinto vs. Metro Rio Tinto. Yes exactly. For some weird reason the metro station closer to the Rio Tinto train station is Campainha and not Rio Tinto as one would expect. Naturally you could walk from Metro Rio Tinto station to Train Rio Tinto station, but the Metro station closer is Campainha. See [27] (640m distance) vs [28] (890m).

- Regarding (historic) tram, I suggest that a) you use a different line style, as it is encased with the thin white color, like Metro and b) you choose the official colors the operator STCP uses, as per their official map [29] (via)

- Tram stop names are correct, just double checked on their map as well.

- An important observation: due to Metro works in downtown Porto, there was a change on tram lines. Line 18 was temporarily shortened and Line 22 was temporarily deactivated. Line 18 had a loop on the right side (as per official map above), that was shortened (as per OSM). OSM recorded the shortened path in a deactivated route ([30]). You could choose to either not show this on the map, or show on a different, dashed or semitransparent fashion.

- Regarding São Bento and Funicular dos Guindais. Yes it is a connection but you have to walk around the block (300m for the nearest exit). [31]

- Regarding Batalha, yes it is a bit weird. The issue is that there is a square called "Praça da Batalha" (lit. Battle Square) with a tram stop "Batalha", and them Funicular dos Guindais upper station is also "Batalha". It also has a tram stop there, so to differentiate them they call it "Batalha-Guindais".

- Regarding Aliados (tram and metro), yes it is a very short walk ([32]).

- For Funicular dos Guindais, I suggest using the gray color, as it is it's vehicles color ([33]).

- For Teleférico de Gaia, you could either use gray again (gondolas color), yellow (operator logo color) or keep it pink (to differentiate it because it is "touristic", i.e. not included in regular public transport fare). See operator website with gondola photos --ArlindoPereira (talk) 10:59, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira I'm right now reading a book by a Swedish author and the book is named and is about "saudade", is that familiar to you?

Metro works, I don’t understand you and I can’t see any differences between OSM and the operators info. Try to explain differently.
Draft 1&2 insets-2.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en never heard about that book in specific, but saudade is often on those "untranslatable words" lists, it's a portuguese word that more or less translates to "the feeling that you feel when you miss something or someone"

Loved the transfers, specially on Campanhã.
Regarding the trams:
- the blue line is completely deactivated due to Metro Line Pink (G) construction affecting surface traffic;
- the red line is partially deactivated - that loop on the right is deactivated, i.e. it goes from Passeio Alegre to Clérigos via Cordoaria and returns on the same tracks;
- there's a shared path between tram line 1 and line 18, so the tracks between Passeio Alegre and Museu do Carro Eléctrico need to have green and red colors. --ArlindoPereira (talk) 16:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Yes exactly, didn't expect you to know about the book, just the word, it's interesting. In Swedish we have a word Lagom, the meaning is, not to much not to little just about enough. Will be back with the rest. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:16, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Just noticed another detail: on the Inset 2, at Trindade station it is missing a link to Line D yellow (which is just outside of the zoom part, but because it appears on the zoomed version, it might make sense to make it on the zoomed part only on the bottom). --ArlindoPereira (talk) 06:15, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Draft insets 1&2-3. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 13:10, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en looks very nice. Liked the tram solution as well as the "zoom out" to São Bento. Regarding it's legend, "Eléctrico" means literally tram in pt-pt, so it would make sense that it reads either "Eléctrico X" or "Tram X", instead of both "Eléctrico" and "tram" together. Oh and it is also missing a tram line 18 legend on the left side.

Other than that, on Guindais funicular, it initial station could be called "Batalha" only, and it is missing the connection between that station and São Bento. --ArlindoPereira (talk) 13:53, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is fine I will now continue with over all map with everything in it. I had to have those insets finished first so I know where everything should be. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en looking very nice. A couple of details I noticed:

it is missing Line F on Trindade
because everything else is in Portuguese (Linha A-F instead of Line A-F etc.), it might make sense to call also the tram lines in Portuguese (i.e. Eléctrico 1 / 18). Though, on the other hand, we would need to translate the others (Funiculars - Funicular (same word in pt, but in singular) and Teleférico instead of Cable car). --ArlindoPereira (talk) 12:26, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Linha, not sure I understand, we do have Linha already?
Both insets, I changed the line names for metro to black as the lines have black so it separerats from train, OK?
Inset 2, if the line name is Teleférico do we also need that word in the station names?

Draft insets1&2-5 --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 13:01, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now it correctly shows all 6 lines in Trindade (it was missing Line F on the legend). The order is a bit random, it could be alphabetically A to F.
Yeah, I agree it makes sense too.
AFAICT there are no names for Teleférico stations, you can use what OSM uses, Estação Alta and Estação Baixa (lit. high station and low station).
One feedback I got from SkyScraperCity: if possible, make the Campainha station fit into a single line. I believe it might fit it you move the text slightly to the bottom left). --ArlindoPereira (talk) 20:27, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't fit Campainha below, had to move it up.

Draft insets-6. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:15, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en looks nice, let's proceed with the bigger picture :) --ArlindoPereira (talk) 06:42, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArlindoPereira Now I have a first draft with everything in it. You have to check everything because I have had to change in several places, it's complex and I have looked at it so long I can't really see it any more as a whole thing.

Porto all-1. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:25, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Haven't seen this post, thanks for pinging me via email! I think it looks fantastic. I'll collect feedback from the Portuguese community on en:SkyscraperCity and let you know. ArlindoPereira (talk) 15:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en looks like it is only missing some logos on the legend. Both eléctricos and funicular are operated by STCP (this one has a PNG logo, but should be fairly easy to vector, if you want I can run it through Inkscape) while the teleférico needs this logo, that I just uploaded to Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_Telef%C3%A9rico_de_Gaia.png (idem). ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:50, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Converted them to svg.

It's really hard to believe I didn't make any mistakes or misunderstood something in all that.
Draft Porto all 2.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 14:57, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en just reviewed the stops names:

on Metro line A/F (blue/orange), on the left, maybe add some small lines/arrows to indicate which stop is Matosinhos Sul and which is Câmara Matosinhos, as by their position they are a bit ambiguous;
on train line blue (Guimarães), there is a dash missing in station Recarei-Sobreira;
everything else is correct.

ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:13, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en just noticed that on Campanhã, it is missing the "bubble" for Linha de Leixões. --ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en a SSC forist gave an interesting idea: what if we drop all of "Linha [de]" text on the bubbles and just write directly "A", "Leixões" etc. instead of "Linha A", "Linha de Leixões"? That could help declutter things a little bit, specially around Campanhã because we could stack the Metro lines bubbles horizontally instead of vertically. --ArlindoPereira (talk) 12:14, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me, it's you people who knows what is good for understanding in your language/region. A few thoughts:

What do we do with Eléctrico 1 and 18?
If we do this I want us to change the other two maps which is a "part" of this?

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:07, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Awesome.

I think that they should be only "1" and "18", as the other lines are not numbered and we can refer to the legend.
Sure, it might look better. It might be worth to give it a try. We can also ask the SSC community for external opinion.

--ArlindoPereira (talk) 06:39, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft porto all 5 --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en the feedback I got:

Metro do Porto
- Line C ends at Campanhã station, not Estádio do Dragão;
- Line D, on the bigger map, remove D. João II and Manuel Leão names and add Santo Ovídio, as it has "higher importance" (in terms of being a bigger centrality + having being the end station for Line D for many years);
- Line E Aeroporto station could have an airplane sign next to it;
- On the smallest map, on Trindade station, replace the order of "C B A / F E D" for "A B C / D E F"
On the legend:
- the lines "pills" could have the full name as in "Linha [de] (...)" / "Eléctrico (...)" while on the map they could keep supressed;
- the subtitle "CP Longo Curso" could be in bold.

--ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en btw about the Line C ending at Campanhã station, just double checked Metro do Porto map and it is correct there, so you don't need to recheck it. :) --ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:05, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Line D, on the bigger map, remove D. Which D, there are two?
Draft all 6

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:11, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Goran tek-en, I think we have reached the publish state, there is nothing left to fix :)

(Regarding the previous comment ("D") there was a bit of confusion but you did the changed as I expected.) --ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira Then I will need the following;

Name of the file
Description (/language)
Captions/s (/language)
Category/ies at commons
Structured data/Items portrayed in this file, the Q#, to be able to upload it at commons, thanks.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:48, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Porto Public Transport Map
Description
- English
  - Map of Portugal's north region showing six metro lines operated by Metro do Porto, five urban train lines operated by CP, two tramway lines, a funicular and a aerial car in great Porto area.
- Portuguese
  - Mapa da região norte de Portugal mostrando as seis linhas do Metro do Porto, as cinco linhas de comboios urbanos operados pela CP, as duas linhas de eléctricos, o funicular e o teleférico na região do Porto.
Caption
- English
  - Porto Public Transport Map
- Portuguese
  - Mapa dos Transportes Públicos do Porto
Categories
Structured data
- Generic: Q10384270 (proeminent), Q86274083, Q2652989
- Metro do Porto: Q29757, Q18473912, Q10318669, Q10318673, Q10318679, Q10318682, Q10318684
- CP: Q10388221, Q2624115, Q25430027, Q124220670, Q18473945, Q124221046, Q574783
- Trams: Q3135966
- Funicular: Q2228562
- Teleférico: Q10379193

ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now you can find it here Porto Public Transport Map.

Please check all the information, also links for wikipedia, wikidata and structured data.
I have also updated the previous maps, metro and train as we talked about before. Moved some line names in train to be more as the others, got more space now.
If you are happy with this please put the code "{{section re.solved|1=~~~~}}" (without the ".") on this request so it can be archived, thanks.

Done --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en it looks fantastic, you are awesome. :)

Just double checked all categories, structured data etc. and it is all correct.

But I noticed that there was one change missing:

Line C ends at Campanhã station, not Estádio do Dragão.

Therefore on Estádio do Dragão station, instead of "A B C E F" it should read only "A B E", as also line F does not end there.

This is correct on Metro-only map, so only the current map needs to be fixed. --ArlindoPereira (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Estádio do Dragão

Now I understand what what you meant. I was just looking at the lines not line names.
But then also F should be removed from there?

Campanhã

Shouldn't just Aveiro be there, all the others pass thru?

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Estádio do Dragão

Yes, so it should be "(A) (B) (E)" at Estádio do Dragão.

Campanhã

São Bento is the terminus station for all of CP Urbanos lines (except Leixões), so Campanhã is not a terminus for any of those lines. So maybe we could remove the lines indication of the "middle" map (leaving only the indication where the lines are cut off) and add them to São Bento (Aveiro, Braga, Guimarães and Marco) on the more zoomed in. --ArlindoPereira (talk) 17:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have made changes in the two zoom in, Draft all 1 --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:19, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en that's it, perfect :) --ArlindoPereira (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Map used in around 80 articles (improvement/correction)

Map of early historic south India

Map of early historic south India
Periplous of the Erythraean Sea locations

Article(s): Around 80 articles

Request: 1. Map of early historic south India - kindly remove the internal borders from the map (as they are largely estimations - locations of various ancient polities or tribes). Please smudge the lines or something. 2. Periplous of the Erythraean Sea locations - This image looks incredibly amateur. Kindly remove the strange white fog all over the image. Please make this a professional map. --JamesMdp (talk) 14:58, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): @JamesMdp: You have two request for this map here, it's really confusing, please join them to one.; On your other request I have written some information for you and here below is a copy of it:; This might be an explanation why it's hard to get someone to work on this.; That file is not a true svg, there is a bitmap included in it (to show the topography, etc). The mist you are talking about is white to cover the bitmap so the legend is more legible. The svg file it self has a lot of clipped objects, so it's a really complicated file to edit or work in and then there are also several langues within the file.; So for me, I would not edit or work on that file. My only solution would be to create a new map, a version of this and leave this as it is, then people can use which version they like. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:45, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maps of the Principality of Monaco

Moved from Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Maps_of_the_Principality_of_Monaco: 痛^Designism (talk) 16:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request: All maps of the Principality of Monaco should now feature the new Mareterra district, built on the sea and opened to the public in December 2024. --InfattiVedeteCheViDice (talk) 08:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): The district was opened as Le Portier. Mareterra was the name at time of construction. --Minoa (talk) 01:51, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vectorize raster map files

Raster map 1
Raster map 2
Raster map 3
Raster map 4

Article(s): en:SEPTA Regional Rail, en:SEPTA, en:PATCO Speedline, and en:Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission

Request: Hi! Please vectorize these four raster map files. Please add Franklin Square station to the third map since it will be reopening next month. Thank you! --OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 13:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OrdinaryScarlett I do need your knowledge on this request, it's a bit hard to understand what is what.

On this page there a some maps (pdf's), could you tell me which is the correct for each of the three Raster maps you supplied above?
- Please also tell what exactly what that I need is named in the legends, thanks?

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 14:05, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: For the first raster map, the first PDF is fine, just focus only on the thin-blue lines. File:SEPTA Regional Rail Diagram.svg is a good resource for telling which lines are former Pennsylvania Railroad lines (red) and former Reading Railroad lines (blue). The yellow on the raster map corresponds to the blue on the vector map, and the blue on the raster map corresponds to the red on the vector map. The legend should describe which lines are for Pennsylvania Railroad lines and which are former Reading Railroad lines. For the second raster map, you can vectorize the geographic boundaries as-is. Everything can be vectorized as-is, but for the light rail and rapid transit lines in the second raster map, you could use the colors from the second PDF map and the names "B", "L", "M", "D", (and maybe even add the "T" lines, see the interactive map in the infobox for the en:T (SEPTA Metro) article) or alternatively, just vectorize the entire map as-is if that's easier. The third raster map can be vectorized as-is, but just needs a station named "Franklin Square" (could alternatively be shortened to "Franklin Sq") on the curve just north of 8th & Market. For that one you could use the second PDF map, but just focusing exclusively on the red line to see what I mean. The fourth one can be vectorized as-is. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SEPTA

Rail system

PATCO

Update and vectorize biomes of Turkey

source
crop
version by LápizRoto

I used an online tool to crop but I could not figure out how to save it as svg

Article(s): en:List of ecoregions in Turkey and others

Request: I looked in “Category:Biome maps” but I could not find anything. I would like to add the names of the biomes so they can be translated.

Could you possibly update per ^[1]^[2]? --Chidgk1 (talk) 11:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Chidgk1, please take a look. I got the names of the biomes directly from the source SVG (I also tried your links, but they were confusing and didn't seem to align exactly with the source details). If you would like me to make any other changes, just let me know exactly what you need. Or if you're happy with the result, let me know too. LápizRoto (talk) 06:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

↑ Western Eurasia | Realm & Subrealms (in en). One Earth (2025-03-07). Retrieved on 2025-03-10.
↑ Central Eurasia | Realm & Subrealms (in en). One Earth (2025-03-07). Retrieved on 2025-03-10.

Map is unmaintainable by editors who might wish to correct details

Article(s): wikipedia:en:Law#Legal_systems

Request: Are there any frameworks or tools that could replace this file with a version that maintains the high graphical quality of the original, but permits granular editing (for example of facts like changing political boundaries, or developments in the subject matter, or corrections resulting from sourcing errors)? TheFeds 21:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): @TheFeds: Not sure what you mean? Are you struggling with editing SVG files, in such case you can use Inkscape. BorysMapping (talk) 10:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

maps of the four voyages of Christopher Columbus

This map has indications of cities that at the time of Columbus' voyage had not yet been founded.
This map has indications of cities that at the time of Columbus' voyage had not yet been founded.
This map has indications of cities that at the time of Columbus' voyage had not yet been founded.
This map has indications of cities that at the time of Columbus' voyage had not yet been founded.
This map has indications of cities that at the time of Columbus' voyage had not yet been founded.

Article(s): Christopher_Columbus and spanish version Cristóbal_Colón

Request

(This maps has indications of cities that at the time of Columbus' voyage had not yet been founded.) --Debray05 (talk) 16:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Debray05

Suggestions:

You could put that information in the different maps Information part and write which, because maybe they are included so that people will easier locate the routes.
If you want some cities removed you will have to provide which cities in which map so the graphic worker will know (probably the graphic worker will have no knowledge of this, this is your field of interest/knowledge) and then they can be uploaded as new versions and not overwrite the current ones.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 14:05, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Goran, nice to meet you.

Sorry for just reading your comment.

Perfect! I have left the message in each discussion in the “Information” section of each image.

I understand that you have used current cities as a guide, but the truth is that during Columbus' voyages, those cities did not exist.

Instead, there were pre-Columbian cities, which I have indicated in each message so that when a designer decides to help us with the adjustment, they can use them as a guide.

Thank you very much. Debray05 (talk) 16:58, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Debray05 Please always ping me.

I'm sorry I should have checked the files more closely before. They have different languages translated within the code of the file. This can be a useful thing sometimes but it also complicates things, and it doesn't work so great sometimes.

I do not use the translation tool myself [translation tool for the first image) and I don't have any good knowledge about it.

So this makes everything more complicated and I do not have the knowledge to work with this, so I will not be able to help you with this, sorry. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Nguyễn dynasty map

Orthographic map of Nguyễn dynasty
Maps of Vietnam during the reign of Emperor Minh Mạng

Article(s): Nguyễn dynasty, Dynastie Nguyễn

Request: I would like to have some corrections for the map:

- The land mentioned as Sip Song Chau Tai should be dark green/red because Sip Song Chau Thai was a tusi, not a tributary state

- These territory: 1, 2 should be dark green/red because it was land of native tribes submitted to the dynasty, not parts of J'rai chiefdoms

- The provinces of Bolikhamsay, Savannakhet (except Chantabuli, Sanoumane, Lahanam and Song Khone in this map page 128) of Laos, southern part of Nakhon Phanom (or former Nakhon Phanom, which can be shown in this map) of Thailand should be dark green/red as said in Đại Nam nhất nhống chí by Embassy of National history.

- The central Mnong and Kraol in this map should be Cambodian/Trấn Tây Thành land as said in Les jungles Moi. --Khanh ( talk | contribs | CA | vi ) 11:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. “The land mentioned as Sip Song Chau Tai should be gray/white because not only because the Lê dynasty lost that land to China but the Sip Song Chau Thai itself was a tusi, not a tributary state.”

👉 Bro... Sip Song Chau Tai had already been under Đại Việt’s nominal suzerainty since Lê Thánh Tông, complete with imperial edicts and tribute. Using modern maps to override feudal tributary logic is peak “Wikipedia Today = Emperor of the Past” energy 😭📜

----2. “The provinces of Bolikhamsay, Savannakhet of Laos, Nakhon Phanom of Thailand should be dark green/red as said in Đại Nam nhất thống chí by Embassy of National history.”

👉 So you just casually annex Nakhon Phanom from Siam into Đại Nam without a single Nguyễn-era map to back it up? That’s some next-level “alternate timeline DLC” thinking. Nguyễn lords fought Siam, yes — but they didn’t teleport to modern-day Thailand 💀

----3. “The drainage basin of Sé San in Kon Tum province (can be seen in this map) should be gray/white because it was kingdom of Champasak land, as said in Les jungles Moi by Henri Maitre.”

👉 Which century are you referring to? During the Nguyễn dynasty, the entire Sê San basin was already in Trấn Tây Thành territory. Champasak was a power ping-ponging between Siam and Đại Nam. Citing Les jungles Moi, a book on minorities, for political borders is like quoting David Attenborough on imperial tax policy 😭

----4. “Mondulkiri should be light green/red because is was J'rai chiefdoms land.”

👉 Sorry to break it, but Mondulkiri was primarily Mnong territory. It became part of Trấn Tây Thành during Nguyễn rule — check the 1838 admin map. Don’t redraw history borders with... Google Earth + vibes 😭🗺️

----5. “The cental Mnong and Kraol in this map should be Cambodian/Trấn Tây Thành land as said in Les jungles Moi.”

👉 Ohhh now it’s Trấn Tây Thành again? Which was under Đại Nam? So you're confirming it was Nguyễn territory? Man’s writing logic like a Mobius strip: self-referencing, spinning, and returning to square one 😭🔁

----6. “Because it was land of native tribes submitted to the dynasty, not parts of J'rai chiefdoms.” (về Bình Thuận và Phan Rang)

👉 You just admitted these lands submitted to the dynasty, right? They were fully integrated with districts and all — see the 1838 map. Not coloring them is like saying “Yeah they’re in the empire, but my highlighter ran out” 🖍️😭

----7. (Posts Mnong language map to back previous points)

👉 Citing a language distribution map to argue over Nguyễn administrative borders is like using a whale migration chart to fight a UNCLOS maritime dispute. Wrong tool, right argument — 10/10 for mental gymnastics 🤯 DannamEmpire (talk) 04:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DannamEmpire

1. It was tusi just like the other tusi in northeast back then, not a tributary state, so I requested it should be the same color.

2. Đại Nam nhất thống chí

tập 2 quyển V phần tỉnh Nghệ An page 163 said: "Phủ Lạc Biên: ở phía tây nam, cách tỉnh thành 12 ngày đường; phía đông đến địa giới phủ Trấn Tĩnh và Mục Đa Hán, phía tây đến địa giới man Xây Nha Bô Ly nước Vạn Tượng, phía nam đến địa giới man Ca San nước Xiêm La, phía bắc đến bờ sông Khung địa giới huyện Cam Linh phủ Trấn Định, phía tây bắc đến thành Vạn Tượng đường đi 20 ngày, phía đông nam đến địa giới nước Xiêm La đường đi 1 ngày; nguyên là man Lạc Hoàn." (Translate it yourself). It said Lạc Biên was between Mukkdahan and Xayabuly. As this map provided, "Xayabuly" is actually located in modern north Nakhon Panom, so the south was Đại Nam teritory.

3. Les jungles Moi isn't only about the minorities but also their relation with other states. In the file I got in Vietnamese version in page 235, it said: "Về phía Đông, người Lào thâm nhập vào thung lũng sông Pekô và định cư tới tận thung lũng sông Kr. Bla, trong đồng bằng Kontum. Người Bahnar ngày nay còn có thể chỉ rõ vị trí của những điểm di dân cuối cùng này, nằm đối diện ngay với Kontum; vả chăng, ngoài các thửa ruộng, người ta còn tìm thấy tại đây "nhiều mồ mả, các bệ đá và cả một bức tượng bằng đồng, không may hiện nay đã bị vỡ, xác nhận ở vùng này từng có những trung tâm văn minh khá phát triển"." (maybe I can be wrong because it's valley)

4. and 5. I realised I was wrong and then I changed it, what's the matter?

6. That map doesn't even right.

7. Les jungles Moi page 254 said: "Tuy nhiên, phần lớn các xóm Mnong vẫn quy phục vua Khmer; trưởng xóm của họ là những người được tỉnh trưởng của tỉnh Cambodge gần nhất bổ nhiệm". Khanh ( talk | contribs | CA | vi ) 13:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. "Sip Song Chau Tai was just a tusi, not a tributary state."

→ Claiming Sip Song Chau Tai wasn't tributary to Đại Việt because it was a tusi is like saying Scotland isn’t part of the UK because it has devolved powers. Also, the area consistently paid tribute to the Lê and Nguyễn courts, and was recorded in both Vietnamese annals and imperial administrative listings. Being a tusi didn't mean independent.

----

2. "Đại Nam Nhất Thống Chí says Lạc Biên was between Mukdahan and Xayabuly, so southern Nakhon Phanom was Đại Nam."

→ Your argument assumes 19th-century toponyms match 21st-century GPS grids. Even the book says “20 days to Vientiane” and “12 days to the provincial capital” – we’re talking pre-modern logistics, not Google Maps. Also, Xayabuly is clearly marked in northern Laos, not modern Nakhon Phanom, unless we accept your cartographic headcanon.

----

3. "Les Jungles Moi says Laotians moved into Kontum, so Champasak once owned it."

→ Migration ≠ sovereignty. If Lao settlers moved to Kontum, it doesn’t magically become territory of Champasak. Otherwise, Vietnamese expats in Paris would mean Hà Nội owns the Eiffel Tower. Henri Maitre was writing ethnographic observations, not land titles.

----

4. "I realized I was wrong and I changed it, what's the matter?"

→ The matter is you changed five positions in three days and kept the rest of your arguments like a buffet — pick what tastes right that day.

----

5. "That map doesn’t even right."

→ Coming from the guy using 2025 administrative boundaries to revise 1830 maps, that’s rich.

----

6. "Les Jungles Moi says Mnong were loyal to the Khmer King, so Mondulkiri was Cambodian land."

→ Sure, and the Scots swearing fealty to the English crown means London owned the Highlands? No, loyalty or nominal subordination doesn’t translate to clear sovereignty. And no Nguyễn map includes Mondulkiri, Khmer maps neither. The place was barely mapped, let alone ruled.

----

7. "The Mnong and Kraol in this map should be Cambodian/Trấn Tây land." (referring to Pavie map)

→ Bro, even Pavie wouldn’t agree. Those maps show influence zones, not fixed borders. Claiming ethnic Mnong = Khmer land = Trấn Tây = “paint it Cambodian” is like drawing a border around every French-speaking area and calling it France. That’s not how state borders work, even in Indochina.

----

Conclusion:

You're not editing history, you're roleplaying as a 19th-century geographer with a GPS and a bias filter set to “headcanon mode.” The sources you cite are valuable — but your interpretations? That’s the real fiction. DannamEmpire (talk) 14:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. Sorry that my words made you confusing. First I thought that territory lost to China (which is why I thought it should be white/gray) and the Sip Song Chau Tai wasn't tributary state (so I thought it shouldn't be light color). But I read the Nhất thống chí again and I found out phủ Điện Biên still included that land, so the land that lost to China is still modern-day China.

2. It was actually Sania Bouri (which can be shown as Chayaburi in other maps), I mistaked it. And I couldn't find other map other than that non-preference map.

3. Well, I searched for documents for that area and found out it was barely documented, so the area was independent. Vietnamese just had trading relationships with these area.

4. Ummm...That doesn't bring any profit for me to play around with that. I know that it can be difficult for graphics to edit the map, but I just want to help with anything I could find.

5. And the map still wrong? Maybe I can use modern map but I just want to illustrate the territory for better imagination.

6. Yes, the area was barely mapped because European didn't know well about Central Highlands, so we should use documents instead of maps. Đại Nam thực lục tập 5 quyển 212 page 709, 710 said: "Tên Liệt nói: năm trước hắn đi buôn đã đến nước Thuỷ Xá, hành trình từ huyện Sơn Bốc đến chỗ Quốc trưởng ở, ước độ 6 ngày, cách chỗ ở của Quốc trưởng Hỏa Xá độ 2 ngày đường. Đất nước ấy, đông giáp nước Hoả Xá, tây giáp man Phủ Nộn, tiếp giáp với các huyện Sơn Phủ (Sambour), Sơn Bốc (Samboc) và Quế Lâm (Kratié), tập 6 quyển 1 page 92 said: "Đổi lại danh hiệu hai nước Thuỷ Xá, Hỏa Xá [...] Nước Hỏa Xá : phía đông giáp Thuỷ Xá, tây giáp đất Sơn Phủ thành Trấn Tây, bắc giáp bọn Man có bộ lạc nhất định"

7. Pavie just painted it generally. Maybe that isn't correct but the most correct map that I could find. Compare Mnong with French just doesn't make sense when there are many ethnic groups and areas that speak French. Khanh ( talk | contribs | CA | vi ) 11:07, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Editing files of sports maps

Request

Hello Commons, I was wondering if someone with knowledge in editing files may edit these three, removing the states of Alaska and Hawaii. The reason is because these states do not have to be shown, since Canada, which is included, does not have all its states represented. The current versions are less ideal and clutter the maps. Thank you! --Yovt (talk) 21:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Venezuelan naval blockade

.svg map
.png cropped map for reference

Article(s): es:Bloqueo naval a Venezuela de 1902-1903

Request: Hi. I recently created the map File:Mapa del bloqueo naval a Venezuela de 1902-1903.svg about the 1902–1903 naval blockade of Venezuela, it's the first time that I edit in vector maps adding objects and text. I feel that the ship icons are too cramped together and there could be a better edition for the text and the items.

I wanted to ask if the error in the .svg could be fixed, as well as possibly adding an arrow: the original map had one showing the movement of the Vinetta ship from the right to the left, which is why it appears twice in the map, but I didn't know how to edit it either. Many thanks in advance, --NoonIcarus (talk) 14:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Correct errors of regional borders on Kazakhstan location map

Kazakhstan location map

Article(s):

Regions of Kazakhstan and related articles
Request: Some of the regional borders shown in this Kazakhstan location map file are currently incorrect. These maps have not been updated for over 2 years since 2022, and I believe this issue needs to be addressed urgently. Can someone please correct the borders using OpenStreetMap or other accurate data?

Some of the recognizable errors include:

The lower part of the Aktobe Region-Kyzylorda Region border (The territory of the Aktobe Region should be shifted further east to include part of the Aral Sea)
A part of the Jambyl Region-Almaty Region border on Lake Balkhash (There are also parts of the Almaty Region on the western side of Lake Balkhash)
A part of the Abai Region-Jetisu Region border on Lake Alakol (The border runs through the largest island in the lake, Ul'kun-Aral-Tyube)
A part of the Abai Region-East Kazakhstan Region border (Where Lake Zaysan meets the Irtysh River, the territory of the Abai Region includes all of the western side of the Irtysh River)

There may be additional errors that are not recognized. -- Lee6597 (talk) 10:53, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Update outdated map

Outdated map

Article(s): en:Canada Line

Request: Hi! This map file is outdated by 15 years and should be updated. The Millennium Line has been removed from the stretch of the Expo Line depicted on this map, and should be removed. It’d be nice for everything to also be realigned up to each other following the fact, and the shared black arrowhead currently shared between the two lines on the map to just be the Expo Line’s dark blue, just like the West Coast Express’ purple arrowhead. Furthermore, “VCC–Clark” should also be removed as that is for the Millennium Line, as well as the Millennium Line being removed from the legend altogether, maybe also having it slightly resized to reflect that. Lastly, Capstan should be added as an additional station on the Richmond–Brighouse branch after where the line forks into two, before Aberdeen. Thank you! --OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:29, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Kashmir map

CIA map
descriptive, non-topographic, SVG map
non-descriptive, topographic, SVG map

Request

Hello! I need an SVG map based off the info provided in the jpg CIA map above please. It is supposed to be a merger of maps 2 and 3 but with more detail. Thank you --𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:24, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is attempting to change a Wikiprojects India Pakistan China consensus of August 2019 for the topographic CIA map which was made by professional cartographers. They have impulsively come here. Fowler&fowler (talk) 10:29, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. I have told you that I am going to start an RfC there, and Commons has nothing to do with this. I've already told you on that discussion that consensus can change. You already said that you aren't going to continue this discussion, but are now trying to do so on commons? 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 14:41, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by LápizRoto (talk) 11:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Periplous of the Erythraean Sea

Moved from COM:GL/I#Periplous of the Erythraean Sea

Periplous of the Erythraean Sea locations

Article(s): Very many articles.

Request: This is my second request regarding this image. It looks cluttered — dots, labels, and colors are all over the place. There's also a strange mist over the Indian Ocean. Could someone please work on this and improve it?--JamesMdp (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): @JamesMdp This might be an explanation why it's hard to get someone to work on this.; That file is not a true svg, there is a bitmap included in it (to show the topography, etc). The mist you are talking about is white to cover the bitmap so the legend is more legible. The svg file it self has a lot of clipped objects, so it's a really complicated file to edit or work in and then there are also several langues within the file.; So for me, I would not edit or work on that file. My only solution would be to create a new map, a version of this and leave this as it is, then people can use which version they like. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo maps into German

Article(s):de:Kosovokrieg

Request

Could someone translate the map into German, please? Thanks in advance.--RaveDog (talk) 13:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RaveDog, Can you please mention here the place names and translations in German so that I can use them on the map? — Meghmollar2017 • Talk • 06:33, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure :).

Map1 left: Legend = Legende; Albanians = Albaner; Serbs = Serben; Muslims = Muslime; Romanis = Roma, Montenegrins = Montenegriner, Croats = Kroaten; Others = Andere

Map1 right: Bevölkerung nach ethnischer Zugehörigkeit im Kosovo (nach Ort) Laut Volkszählung von 1981

Map2 names: Albania = Albanien; Central Serbia = Zentralserbien; Macedonia = Mazedonien²; Prishtina = Pristina; Gjilani = Gjilan; Prizreni = Prizren¹

Map2 legend: Standorte im Kosovo und im südlichen Zentralserbien, an denen Luftstreitkräfte der NATO während der Bombenangriffe im Jahr 1999 verbotene Munition mit abgereichertem Uran einsetzte

¹For the Kosovo cities, the Albanian name is listed at the beginning and the Serbian name is listed in brackets. The translations I provide correspond to the common German names according to the Foreign Office of the Federal Republic of Germany. The question here is whether to leave the names as they are or to put both national language variants in brackets.
²In 1999, North Macedonia was called Macedonia. Therefore I would leave it like that.

Thank you! RaveDog (talk) 07:22, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

btw Montenegro and Kosovo are the same in German RaveDog (talk) 07:24, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Meghmollar2017 Hope you don't mind me doing this.

@RaveDog As I don't know exactly which font was used before they are not exactly the same.

Check so it's correct then I can upload them. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en Thank you for your maps. Draft map1 seems to be correct. There's a little mistake in the second map. it's angereichertem, not ab-. RaveDog (talk) 07:41, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RaveDog Well I just copied from above, will change.

Could you give me the Information texts for each map in German, thanks.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:25, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Map of drainages around Misti volcano

Description of first imageMALL map illustration (copy 2025-08-29 16.48.54)

Description of first imageMALL map illustration (copy 2025-08-29 16.48.54)

Article(s): en:Misti

Request: Can someone make a map of all the creeks around Misti volcano, with their names labelled? It was asked for here. Here is a source. --Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:30, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Could you direct to the relevant page number(s) in the source, and exactly what the creeks to be marked are? And also if you would like the physiographic relief to be embedded as a raster, etc. LápizRoto (talk) 13:21, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am assuming Carabaya, Honda, Grande, Agua Salada, Huarangual, Chilca, San Lazaro and Pastores but please confirm. LápizRoto (talk) 13:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So apparently the source has multiple maps (figures 1, 3 and 4) that contain this information. Physiographic relief is good, yes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request taken by --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 14:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus @LápizRoto

I need to know what kind of map you expecting, is it something like page 7, figure 5 (not the view angle but how it's drawn).

If not try to explain or show me the type of map you need, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 14:59, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: I thought more like #4? Figure 5 on my screen isn't a map? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:13, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I see, Any of those:

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More similar to #4, but a simple topographic map with all creeks labelled also works. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus Please always ping me, thanks.

I really need your help now because the three different figures you gave gives very different results.

First I show you what I have "guessed" are the creeks you asked for.

Here I have everything together, same creek from different figures have the same line type and the names are right now just for you to see which is which. As you can see they are in very different places so I don't know which to use.

all together

So i thought that I should check with OSM, so here the creeks are on top of OSM and they hardly follow any of the valleys on OSM.

all OSM

So please help me, which should I use? --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: Oy, that is a problem. Are f4 and f5 at least consistent with each other? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:27, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another option would be to frame them as "Quebrada X or Y" form, maybe? When one map says X and the other Y. I was wondering if this could help but it keeps timing out on me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:33, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What on this page, there are a lot of stuff?

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 14:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have now also used an image file:El_Misti_Volcano_and_Arequipa,_Peru.jpg we have at commons. I compared with OSM topografi and the three images you provided and this is the best adaptation I can do. It is not perfect on any but this is what I can do with the info I have.

So you have to tell me if this is good enough, otherwise I need better images/information and I can't find any? --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: That seems like a good start, but the lines need to match the topography - in the first, the drainages are the pale blue lines. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know, but that is just our problem, we have several sources showing different positions, like the two drafts above.

Comparing different maps is always almost impossible so what I show above is an adaptation of the different sources. Not all of the drainage's are showed on all the different sources so in some way I have to mix them,

You have to tell me which source to follow mostly; Misti on OSM, Misti commonc image or any of the sources?
- I don't have any knowledge of this subject but I would say follow Misti commonc image as this is a real picture and then Misti on OSM with the basic placing from the three first sources.

--please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goran tek-en: Sorry, I meant that in both images, e.g San Lazaro red line clearly does not line up with the topography (OSM) or valley appearance (commonc image). That's not correct. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:27, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]